An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...

Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...

But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...

The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.

The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...

The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling on Tuesday that strikes down some rule that allowed the Environmental Protection ...

Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.

Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...

By a 5-4 vote, the court's conservative majority ruled that the EPA overstepped its authority under the Clean Water Act with ...

The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...