Proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health reimbursement rates have created financial headaches for universities, ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.

Federal workers in Maryland are speaking out against the Department of Government Efficiency and the layoffs and funding cuts ...

Ongoing uncertainty about funding from the National Institutes of Health could imperil medical research at academic ...

The National Institutes for Health (NIH) cut indirect funding for research to 15%, according to supplemental guidance from the NIH. This includes a $35 million cut to the University of Connecticut ...

The extent of the pause on NU's research enterprise remains to be seen — 47% of NU's federal research funding comes from NIH — leaving investigators waiting to learn if they will be able to ...

Major SC research universities like USC, MUSC and Clemson could lose tens of millions of dollars thanks to NIH research ...

UNC Charlotte received the most NIH funding in the area — $56 million since the 2015 fiscal year. The university received ...

The impact will be crippling to biomedical research in the U.S., and institutions will immediately face hard choices about ...

Trump, Musk, and Vought are purging institutions and cutting off access to educational and research opportunities for anyone ...

Of course the effects will vary across research institutions, as institutions differ markedly in their operating models and ...