Meta wins lawsuit over AI training data use, but US judge warns AI firms could still face legal trouble for using copyrighted works without permission.

Judges ruled this week that Anthropic and Meta could 'train' large language models on copyrighted books. But the larger war ...

The suit alleged that Meta violated the authors’ copyrights both in the AI training process and in the process of downloading ...

A federal judge sided with Meta in a lawsuit that alleged the company had illegally trained its AI models on copyrighted ...

Judges ruled this week that Anthropic and Meta could 'train' large language models on copyrighted books. But the larger war over AI developers' use of protected works is far from over.

Meta argued that its AI model training was a transformative use — a key tenet of fair use under US copyright law — and that how it acquired the data was irrelevant. The court agreed that the ...

A federal judge on Wednesday sided with Facebook parent Meta Platforms in dismissing a copyright infringement lawsuit from a group of authors who accused the company of stealing their works to train ...

Meta won a lawsuit over its use of copyrighted books to train AI models, with a judge ruling the practice falls under fair ...

On the heels of our post on Anthropic's mixed ruling in its copyright case, we have witnessed another plot twist in the AI ...

When it was sued by a group of authors for using their books in AI training without permission, Meta used the fair use ...

Meta has prevailed over a group of book authors suing it for copyright infringement. But you need to check the details of this ...

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria found that 13 authors who sued Meta “made the wrong arguments.” But the judge also said that the ruling is limited to the authors in the case and does not mean that ...