Judges ruled this week that Anthropic and Meta could 'train' large language models on copyrighted books. But the larger war ...

The suit alleged that Meta violated the authors’ copyrights both in the AI training process and in the process of downloading ...

A federal judge on Wednesday sided with Facebook parent Meta Platforms in dismissing a copyright infringement lawsuit from a ...

Meta argued that its AI model training was a transformative use — a key tenet of fair use under US copyright law — and that how it acquired the data was irrelevant. The court agreed that the ...

On Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And ...

A federal judge sided with Meta in a lawsuit that alleged the company had illegally trained its AI models on copyrighted ...

The federal judge who ruled in Meta’s favor still isn’t convinced its use of copyrighted materials for AI training qualifies ...

Meta Platforms' lawyers had warned it about the legal perils of using thousands of pirated books to train its AI models, but the company did it anyway, according to a new filing in a copyright ...

Farnsworth said in the lawsuit, opens new tab on Tuesday that Meta fed Llama, which powers its AI chatbots, thousands of pirated books to teach it how to respond to human prompts. Sign up here.

Meta's new privacy policy is facing a legal challenge in 11 European countries, over the way the company plans to use users' personal data to train AI models.

The outcome of this legal dispute could have significant implications for how tech companies handle user data in the context of AI development. If Noyb succeeds in its legal challenges, Meta may ...