A new journal article by a researcher at the University of Manchester offers insight into how artificial intelligence (AI) is ...

The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

Amid concerns that AI could eventually impact jobs held by people today, especially in terms of content creation, Wikipedia indicates that it intends to use AI as a tool that makes people’s jobs ...

Researchers at the MIT Climate and Sustainability Consortium are studying the direct and indirect impacts of using generative ...

Could artificial intelligence be the future of more reliable open-source encyclopedias like Wikipedia? A recent study in Nature Machine Intelligence suggests it might just be the answer. Researchers ...

To celebrate companies leading the way, Newsweek is proud to present the inaugural AI Impact Awards 2025. These awards honor 38 organizations across 13 categories for their outstanding ...

A day later, after many, many editors continued to respond negatively to the idea, Wikimedia backed down and canceled its plans to add AI-generated summaries. Editors are the lifeblood of the platform ...

Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries on articles, but pushback from editors has prompted the platform to halt the feature.

Software AI Wikipedia pauses AI summary experiment after editors say it 'would do immediate and irreversible harm to our readers and to our reputation as a decently trustworthy and serious source ...

“Yuck”: Wikipedia pauses AI summaries after editor revolt The test grew out of a discussion at Wikimedia’s 2024 conference.

Wikipedia has revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years — and it doesn't involve replacing its community with AI, thankfully.