By a 5-4 vote, the court's conservative majority ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency overstepped its authority ...
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...
The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...
The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.
1d
TAG24 on MSNSupreme Court ruling limiting EPA's ability to regulate water pollution raises alarm bellsThe Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate water pollution in a ruling that has ...
The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled for San Francisco in limiting the power of environmental regulators to ...
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...
The conservative Supreme Court aligned with liberal San Francisco on Tuesday, ruling that federal environmental regulators ...
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results