The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in a case against the US Environmental Protection Agency involving the ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
According to the New York Times, the Supreme Court made a decision on whether the Clean Water Act of 1972 allowed the E.P.A.
In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal wing in dissent, the high court says EPA has the responsibility ...
Supreme Court Sides With One of the Nation’s Most Liberal Cities in Challenge to EPA’s Authority
A majority of the Supreme Court sides with San Francisco over a permit the Environmental Protection Agency issued the city.
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean Water Act. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that many are ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...
On March 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided City and County of San Francisco, California v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753, ...
Continuing the rout of the EPA's authority undertaken by the Trump Administration, the Supreme Court Tuesday overturned rules ...
The Supreme Court's recent ruling limits EPA's ability to regulate sewage discharge into U.S. waterways affecting water ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback