We are health care providers concerned about the consequences of the Trump administration’s attempts to restrict or eliminate critical health-care programs.

An analysis by Adam Bonica, a political scientist at Stanford University, presents compelling evidence that U.S. federal ...

How much has been cut or halted remains unclear; the Trump administration has not released a comprehensive, reliable ...

After several years of labor strikes by various groups in the United States, current and former federal employees stood up yesterday.

Under the Trump administration, the National Institutes of Health has placed a 15 percent cap on indirect research costs—a ...

According to at least one analysis, Trump’s financial ax would chop an estimated $800 million from California institutions ...

Recursion CEO Chris Gibson defends the NIH, investing $1 million into a pre-seed venture to encourage critical research and ...

The result is going to be less science, fewer breakthrough therapies, and less innovations,” said Dean Madden of Dartmouth ...

The Trump administration has targeted $4 billion in cuts to “indirect” costs for NIH research grants. Those funds, typically known as overhead, help cover the facilities and support that enable ...

As a small group of graduate students listened in the audience, MD/PhD student Jamie Moffa explained how to convey the ...

Researchers, students and labor organizers gathered on the New Haven Green to oppose cuts to NIH and federal research funding ...

There are two other lawsuits challenging the NIH’s decision to cap how much the agency pays for Facilities and Administrative fees at 15 percent, which is significantly lower than what many ...