Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...

While some in the biotech sector have raised concerns over the economic fallout of reduced NIH funding, others see an opportunity for institutions to reevaluate inefficiencies and focus funding more ...

Cutting federal grant funding will limit access to care ... education and investment opportunities, they said. The NIH’s policy allegedly violated the Administrative Procedure Act, according ...

Without significant institutional support, these schools may be forced to scale back research programs, further shrinking opportunities for early-career scientists. According to Wilson, NIH funding ...

The NIH — like most organizations funding scientific research — pays for the direct cost of research, like researchers’ salaries, and indirect costs, like space, equipment, utilities ...

The University of Iowa is in danger of losing out on $33.4 million in research funding if National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding ... investment and partnering opportunities with the private ...

The NIH, the largest funder of biomedical research in the U.S., will limit funding for indirect costs to 15%. Indirect costs cover expenses like building maintenance and administrative salaries.

The move, announced Friday night by the National Institutes of Health, drastically cuts NIH’s funding for “indirect ... for Research on Equal Opportunity, a think tank that promotes free ...

"Of this funding, approximately $26 billion went to direct costs for research, while $9 billion was allocated to overhead through NIH’s indirect cost rate," NIH said. The average indirect cost ...