Legal experts say the proposed cuts violate federal law and are unlikely to survive a legal challenge by states.

Scientists warn the private medical sector won’t see a boost after DOGE cuts public research funding and emphasizes an ...

The National Institutes of Health said it will cap indirect grant funds, threatening billions of dollars in health systems' ...

Grant funding uncertainty has jeopardized the sustainability of research projects and discouraged researchers.

A federal judge is set to hear arguments today for and against extending a block on the National Institutes of Health’s ...

Direct costs, on the other hand, cover the core project expenses: salaries, equipment and travel, for example. The NIH said the average indirect costs for research grants is about 27%, ...

Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or ...

The Trump administration is exploiting a loophole to keep a funding freeze in place, leaving researchers in limbo.

"NIH-funded scientists are perennially expected to do more with less," writes one stakeholder. Another observer writes, "The ...

They are functions, say libraries or data centers, things you need to run ... Indirect costs are not frills, and NIH grants do not pay the full cost of doing research for just that reason.

Just as we're making progress in the fight against women's heart disease, National Institutes of Health cuts endanger critical research.

"Without support of (facilities and administration) costs, research labs would literally go dark," said a joint statement ...