Late Friday, President Donald Trump ordered a 15% cap on portions of NIH grants that cover "indirect ... $1.2 billion in outstanding bond debt. Chart showing UNC-Chapel Hill's outstanding debts.

In the latest step by the Trump administration affecting scientific research, the NIH says the agency is ... Owens says his organization is "carefully reviewing this policy change as it ...

In fiscal year 2023, NIH doled out more than $35 billion in ... Science News and our parent organization, the Society for Science, need your help to strengthen scientific literacy and ensure ...

The big losers would include prestigious institutions in conservative states. The NIH, the nation’s top funder of biomedical research, announced on Friday that it would substantially limit ...

On what he believes is motivating the slash in NIH funding: " I would say it probably is some combination of political distaste for institutions of higher learning like Harvard and ignorance of ...

Research leaders contend that the NIH decision will damage America’s ability to compete with China and other nations on the frontier of biomedicine. Although it is framed as a simple cost ...

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and ...

The lawsuit — filed by Campbell and peers in 21 other states — names the Trump administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the NIH as defendants. The 15% cap for indirect ...

The new NIH policy will cap that indirect cost rate at 15%, effective immediately.“NIH spent more than $35 Billion in Fiscal Year 2023 on almost 50,000 competitive grants to more than 300,000 ...

The policy, currently blocked by a federal court, would limit NIH research funding for "indirect costs," or overhead expenses, to 15%, which is far below what some institutions receive.

Last week, NIH announced that the funding it provides to grantees for “indirect costs,” like lab, utility and administrative personnel costs, would be limited to 15% of the grant award.

Now, some researchers worry the funding cuts by the NIH — the country’s foremost funder of cutting-edge biomedical research — would impact Indiana’s scientific research capabilities ...