An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...

The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.

The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.

The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...

The conservative Supreme Court aligned with liberal San Francisco on Tuesday, ruling that federal environmental regulators ...

In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal wing in dissent, the high court says EPA has the responsibility ...

The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled for San Francisco in limiting the power of environmental regulators to ...

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a ruling that narrows the Clean Water Act. The case pitted a ...

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in a case against the US Environmental Protection Agency involving the ...

San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...