An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.
The conservative Supreme Court aligned with liberal San Francisco on Tuesday, ruling that federal environmental regulators ...
The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...
The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled for San Francisco in limiting the power of environmental regulators to ...
In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissent, high court says EPA has responsibility to provide details for ...
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...
The U.S. Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a ruling that narrows the Clean Water Act. The case pitted a ...
The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Environmental Protection Agency in a ruling on Tuesday involving a wastewater ...
By a 5-4 vote, the court's conservative majority ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency overstepped its authority ...
San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback