This comes after the July 18 revelation of serious threats from China-linked group UNC3886. Read more at straitstimes.com.

An advanced persistent threat (APT) is defined as a sophisticated, multi-staged cyberattack whereby an intruder establishes and maintains an undetected presence within an organization’s network ...

With names for threat actors like Fancy Bear or Dragon 42, the story sounds more interesting. These names are given to groups known as Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) and often have some clues ...

Advanced persistent threats (APTs) (also known as advanced targeted attacks, or ATAs) are sophisticated network attacks in which an unauthorized person gains access to a network and stays ...

The advanced persistent threat, which is to say the offense that enjoys a permanent advantage and is already funding its R&D out of revenue, will win as long as you try to block what he does.

The advanced persistent threat, which is to say the offense that enjoys a permanent advantage and is already funding its R&D out of revenue, will win as long as you try to block what he does.

We call them "Advanced Persistent Threats," but a new report from Imperva reveals that this kind of attack can work just fine using very simple techniques. When the IBM PC was new, I served as the ...

The term advanced persistent threat (APT) refers to an attacker, usually an organized group of malicious attackers, that should be considered harmful and dangerous — and an overall method of ...

My conversation with Sutton started with his definition of “advanced persistent threat.” According to Sutton, an APT is a very specific kind of attack.

An advanced persistent threat, usually referred to as an APT, is a descriptive rather than technical term that describes a broad class of attacks.

Yesterday, Fortinet released a new report on Advanced Persistent Threats—the big, scary attacks that haunt the dreams of security wonks. The good news is that APTs and their tactics are still ...

The cyber threat is as real and advanced as ever, and with the military as a high-value target, governance for defending cyberspace must be determined as soon as possible.