More than half a billion dollars are at stake for Massachusetts universities, hospitals, and research institutions if federal ...

Shifts in the National Institute of Health’s funding structure will take effect Monday and limit funding for the indirect ...

The administration announced late last week a new cap that would cut billions of research cost funding provided by the ...

The NIH’s move to cut these rates represents an unfortunate attempt to reduce federal spending. While there are ways to improve operational efficiencies, slashing funding for the infrastructure ...

We urge the NIH to honor its current funding commitments. The future of American biomedical research is too important to do anything less.

although "many organizations are much higher -- charging indirect rates of over 50% and in some cases over 60%." When NIH awards a grant, they pay for two different categories of funding ...

Previously, the rate was negotiated for each project. In its statement, the NIH said the move, which was scheduled to go into effect on Monday, was to ensure more of its funding goes directly ...

The Trump administration is cutting billions of dollars in biomedical research funding, alarming academic leaders who said it would imperil their universities and medical centers and drawing swift ...

this means research facilities who receive funding from the NIH will have a cap of 15% on facility and administration fees. The average indirect cost rate currently sits about 27% to 28% with ...