Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...
“If small biotech companies like ours are forced to scale back or shut down, it will not just be a loss for scientific ...
Jan. 25, 2025 In its X post on the change Friday, the NIH shared a graphic that compared the indirect funding rates for Harvard, Yale and Johns Hopkins with their multibillion-dollar endowments.
Federal health research funding has faced a tumultuous four days after the Trump administration announced cuts Friday to a certain type of funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — causing ...
The NIH, the largest funder of biomedical research in the U.S., will limit funding for indirect costs to 15%. Indirect costs cover expenses like building maintenance and administrative salaries.
Efforts by the Trump administration to drastically cut federal investments in medical research are threatening to kneecap major research institutions and stifle scientific progress to combat ...
Oregon Health & Science University is the state’s largest recipient of funding from the National Institutes of Health.
University researchers, however, slammed the funding ... means the NIH research that has been the backbone of the high-tech health economy will be gutted, reducing their economic opportunities ...
A recently announced move by the National Institutes of Health to reduce federal grant funding for indirect costs related to biomedical research threatens to put a stop to some programs and could ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results