Grant funding uncertainty has jeopardized the sustainability of research projects and discouraged researchers.
The National Institutes of Health said it will cap indirect grant funds, threatening billions of dollars in health systems' ...
"NIH-funded scientists are perennially expected to do more with less," writes one stakeholder. Another observer writes, "The ...
Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...
The NIH says funding cuts would save it billions of dollars a year. D.C.-area industry and academic leaders say it would cripple R&D.
Of course the effects will vary across research institutions, as institutions differ markedly in their operating models and ...
Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Paul Nestadt says cutting NIH funding for suicide prevention research is 'not just a fiscal ...
Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or overhead expenses, to 15%.
The National Institutes of Health announced it would cap "Facilities and Administrative" costs at 15% for new and existing grants.
More than half a billion dollars are at stake for Massachusetts universities, hospitals, and research institutions if federal ...
The University of Iowa is in danger of losing out on $33.4 million in research funding if National Institutes of Health ...
Planned funding cuts by the National Institutes of Health’s, the United States’ leading medical research agency, could impact ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results