The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

Researchers at the MIT Climate and Sustainability Consortium are studying the direct and indirect impacts of using generative ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years — and it’s not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial intelligence, thankfully.

Could artificial intelligence be the future of more reliable open-source encyclopedias like Wikipedia? A recent study in Nature Machine Intelligence suggests it might just be the answer. Researchers ...

The 2025 AI Impact Award winners have also been invited to Newsweek's AI Impact Summit, a three-day event in Sonoma, California, from June 23 through 25, ...

A day later, after many, many editors continued to respond negatively to the idea, Wikimedia backed down and canceled its plans to add AI-generated summaries. Editors are the lifeblood of the platform ...

Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries on articles, but pushback from editors has prompted the platform to halt the feature. As ...

Wikipedia has been struggling with the impact that AI crawlers — bots that are scraping text and multimedia from the encyclopedia to train generative artificial intelligence models — have been ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select ...

Amid concerns that AI could eventually impact jobs held by people today, especially in terms of content creation, Wikipedia indicates that it intends to use AI as a tool that makes people’s jobs ...

The nonprofit behind Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years -- and it's not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial ...